数码科技

【AMD Naples 32核双路服务器测试分数曝光】AMD Naples Dual Socket Platform With 32 Zen Cores Per CPU Benchmarked

The entry for the benchmark was made two days ago on Geekbench database. The specific codename for this platform is 2S1451A4VIHE4_29/14_N. This is a dual socket platform that utilizes two processors. Each chip has 32 cores which make up a total of 64 cores on the Naples platform. The chips are clocked at 1.44 GHz base and 2.9 GHz boost clocks as identified OPN. The Naples platform is still months away from launch so we are looking at engineering samples over here.

【分数来自于两天前的Geekbench数据库。这个双路平台的OPN为2S1451A4VIHE4_29/14_N,每个CPU都有32核心,共64核心。从OPN里识别出的信息来看,基础频率为1.44GHz,Boost频率为2.9GHz。Naples平台距离发布还有好几个月,这次的是工程样品。】

img002.jpg

img003.jpg

img001.jpg

During the recent run down on the architectural details for Zen, we noticed that the core comprises of a CPU complex. Each CPU complex features four cores that are connected to 8 MB of L3 cache. From the looks of it, Zen based server chips with 32 cores can feature up to 64 MB of L3 cache which is quite disruptive. This along with 64 threads available for hyper-threaded workloads would make for a very competitive product in server platforms. For full details on Zen Micro-architecture, you can check out a detailed article here.

【对于Zen架构的详细介绍请点击链接

The motherboard for Naples platform is codenamed “AMD Corporation Diesel”. The platform is featuring 128 GB of DDR4 memory. In Geekbench 4, the platform scored 1141 Points in single-threaded and 15620 points in multi-threaded performance tests. We couldn’t find a similar Intel Xeon platform for comparison at Geekbench due to clock differences. These benchmarks are not representative of final performance for Naples as it still has a long way to go before launch. AMD did confirm that Naples will be shipping in Q2, available just a few months after Summit Ridge for desktops.

【该平台使用了128GB DDR4内存,在Geekbench4内,单核分数1141,多核分数15620。由于主频差距,不好找到可以对比的至强平台。AMD确认Naples将在17年第二季度,即桌面Summit Ridge平台数月后出货。】

【Geekbench4在同样的系统环境下,单核性能能代表大概的指向,但并不能体现准确性能,更无法体现真实多核性能。


某些人还在瞎猜,拿了1.1G和1.5G的CoreM3分数作对比,说“同频”。

接着“怀疑与A8 3850同构架”。

先不说智商是否感人,3850是K10.5改进版Husky架构,老处理器,但IPC并不低。

这颗处理器很明显功耗不会很高,属于节能版服务器处理器,而不是高性能版,门控时钟会更加激进。

不对跑分作过多评论,早期ES版的跑分不具有太大参考价值,更何况这是Geekbench4的跑分,这玩意从来都不能拿来当做严谨测试的结果。

“怀疑与A8 3850同构架” — 你这句话的意思就是你比JimKeller还聪明咯?快去做首席架构师,我不拦你。

网民最喜欢的就是半瓶水,一知半解却要去妄作评论


你们啊  不要听得风就是雨

接到这些消息,本身也要判断。 

假使这些完全无中生有的东西

你再帮他说一遍,等于你也有责任吧! 
不能总想着搞个大新闻。 】

source:http://wccftech.com/amd-zen-naples-soc-benchmarks/

自翻,转载请注明出处,严禁私自篡改标题、内容以及二次投递。

剧毒术士马文

留学中 Comp.Arch|RISCV|HPC|FPGA 最近沉迷明日方舟日服 联系方式请 discord 或者 weibo 私信。目前不在其他平台活动。 邮箱已更新为[email protected]。 看板娘:ほし先生♥

相关文章

2 评论

  1. 擦,,,AMD要360度翻身了啊。。。其实还是有点小期待amd的,虽然这么多年推荐人买电脑一直是amdcpu,我本人也是所谓的a粉,但是其实我还是没用过A U,只有显卡一直在用A,,这次淘汰用了6年的i7 950.真心觉得U其实没啥区别,,但是是不是硬盘读取有问题?点击文件总会有一点点卡顿。

发表回复

您的电子邮箱地址不会被公开。 必填项已用*标注

返回顶部按钮